Fox News - Fair & Balanced
Search Site

Wednesday, April 7, 2010 as of 11:14 AM ET

Politics

Lee Ross

Supreme Court

33

comments

Schools: U.S. History Out, Environment In

February 3, 2010 - 1:34 PM | by: Lee Ross

Change often leads to controversy and that is certainly the case in North Carolina where an effort to revamp the state's education system has some people outraged that high school students will not learn enough American history.

The formula for teaching American history has been pretty simple. Start at the beginning and go forward.  But a new proposal under review in North Carolina threatens to disrupt that standard teaching philosophy.

"If our students don't know what happened in world history, and if they don't know what happened in U.S. history from George Washington's presidency all the way up through the Civil War, then they will not be able to grasp the big picture," said Mike Belter, a Social Studies teacher in North Carolina.

The state's on-going curriculum review hits all subjects but it's the proposed changes for high school students learning social studies that have provoked fears. Under the new guidelines, students will graduate without learning enough about world history and key parts of American history including Abraham Lincoln, westward expansion or much else that happened before 1877 when Reconstruction ended, critics say.

"We are certainly not trying to go away from American history. What we are trying to do is figure out a way to teach it where students are connected to it. Where they see the big idea. Where they are able to make connections and draw relationships between parts of our history and the present day so the students who see it as relevant," said Rebecca Garland of the N.C. Department of Public Instruction.

Right now, high school students learn world history in the ninth grade, civics and economics in the tenth and the entirety of U.S. history in the eleventh grade. Under the proposed change, all ninth graders wouldn't study world history. Instead, they''ll have to take a course called Global Studies focusing on the modern issues like the environment.

Tenth graders will still get Civics and Economics, while the junior year U.S. history class would start in 1877.  State officials say events prior to that year will be taught before high school and also incorporated into the sophomore year Civics class.

Education officials acknowledge this is a big change but believe it will allow them to connect with a standard of teaching based on a new national initiative called called Common Core which emphasizes standards to help prepare students with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed in college and careers and to be prepared to compete globally.

"The whole notion of the common core is fewer, clearer and more in depth standards. So that our students remember what's important," Garland said.

" I'm all for a global outlook but it should not be at the expense of American history and learning about American institutions and ideas. And unfortunately this curriculum does just that," said Terry Stoops, an Education Expert and member of the John Locke Foundation.

North Carolina officials are quick to emphasize that the proposal is just that--a proposal. And they are encouraging feedback from teachers and the public about the plan.

Hal Meeks

The concept at face value is ludicrous. But there is an alternative. Our county's school district is on the "semester" system, trying to emulate a college schedule. No college teaches all of U.S. history in one semester; typically the break point is around the Civil War or the end of Reconstruction. If the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction is committed to this idea, then both "halves" of U.S. history should be offered and make it one full credit if both classes are taken.

February 6, 2010 at 3:03 PM
Reply

Craig Jerina

I am not a resident of the state of North Carolina. What is happening in your state is happening all over this country. If you know your American history you know this didn't start yesterday. The progressive movement is a century old. Now the name has been changed again. Just recently liberals, progressives, are now "Populists". This is and has been a concerted effort to dumb down our children and teach them about a "world order". Everyone on this page needs to wake up and get involved.

February 6, 2010 at 11:24 AM
Reply

KF

Another sensationalist, inaccurate article by Rupert Murdoch's empire. Why do people continue to listen to an Australian that changed his citizenship, so he could legally push his oppressive agenda on people in this country as he has in others as well? Oh yeah, who is his number 2 shareholder: the 25th richest person in the world, a Saudi prince. He is your false prophet, oh wayward Christians.

February 6, 2010 at 8:14 AM
Reply

louis vuitton

This is a excessive blog and I be settled turbulent on reading it every morning rowing-boat thanks you right sharing it! louis vuitton handbags

February 6, 2010 at 6:34 AM
Reply

G. Gilmer

It's pretty clear that most of the comments posted here are by folks who haven't read the new proposed NC curriculum (or the current curriculum to compare it to.) The purpose of revamping the curriculum is to improve the quality of teaching and learning for our teachers and students. For one thing, a greater emphasis on US history is planned beginning in 5th grade and it will increase in 7th and 8th grades. Some of you are not happy with the curriculum now, so it makes good sense to update and revamp it. Consider what history is in the first place. History is not a set of black and white facts to be memorized, but a dynamic understanding of events that occurred in the past. Historians continue to research and reinterpret events in order to tell as true a story as possible. The history most of us learn in school is limited to that which textbook publishers choose to include in books which give one-sided, brief synopses of events. Let's educate our children properly with 21st century knowledge and skills, and a global perspective that allows us not only to understand what it once meant to be American but what it means to be citizens of the world and American citizens today. I don't want my children to be ignorant of real issues and understandings about our country in the past or today. This week our country lost a great historian and patriot named Howard Zinn. I recommend his books, including A People's History of the United States, which paints a much broader history of the United States than the history courses I took in the public schools right here in NC. Read the new curriculum proposal and submit thoughtful suggestions to the state curriculum writers. We need educated voices to inform our education system. Educate yourselves, then speak out if you have ideas. I have my concerns about the new curriculum which I will voice through appropriate channels. Lambasting our education system as liberals undermining democracy is ridiculous....

February 5, 2010 at 8:41 PM
Reply

Robert Ahrend

It is about time since their are so many myths in our history and it does not reflect the truth as it should. Foe example, Sybil Ludington made Paul Revere look like a wimp and yet she is an American Heroine that young women can look up to and inspire to be like and I know since I have two biological daughters and one adopted daughter.

February 5, 2010 at 8:19 PM
Reply

marc

I am a long-time social studies teacher in North Carolina, generally recognized as having enjoyed a fair amount of success with my students. The proposed "Essential Standards" are an outrage. The need to evoke more substantive understanding cannot be over-emphasized, however, a deeper command of factual components must precede such an understanding. Additionally, I AM PROUD TO BE A LIBERAL DEMOCRAT and renounce the politicizing of this issue as left vs. right. It is this very idea of "I am right because I'm a [insert your ideaology here]" that is the attitude that is crippling America. We should support quality history instruction because we are AMERICANS, not because we are DAR or ACLU or gay or straight.

February 5, 2010 at 2:38 PM
Reply

janis busath

it simply boggles my mind how some folks have this mindset to do this--to, essentially, 'ex-out' things, very vital events that took place and shaped this nation. this nation just did not magically start up or happen at all. like others here, i am a member, proudly so, of DAR, as well as a BLUE STAR MOTHER. simply the fact alone that folks would propose this garbage flies in the very face of what being an educator, in the truest sense of the word, is. one cannot POSSIBLY know where they are going, IF THEY, FIRST, DO NOT KNOW WHERE THEY HAVE BEEN,AS FAR AS HISTORY IS CONCERNED.

February 5, 2010 at 1:17 PM
Reply

Agnes M. Canzona

I am surprised and shocked that this change in the public schools curriculum is being considered. It is another sign that our country is losing its idenity to the liberals. As a member of the DAR (Daughters of the American Revolution)I am sad that my brave ancestors fought for and achieved American Independence in 1776 for a cause that is not pertinent enough to be included in the public school system in NC. The 1st of 3 DAR objectives is: To perpetuate the memory & spirit of the men & women who achieved American Independence and the 3rd one is: To cherish, maintain, and extend the institution of American Freedom, to foster true patriotism and love of country.

February 5, 2010 at 12:25 PM
Reply

Deborah Michael

You have GOT to be kidding. Can this get any worse? What are these people thinking? - What a great idea - let's leave out all the wars fought on American soil, The founding of our country and the ideals that guided us, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights ... exchanged for a focus on the misguided theory of Global Warming???? This effort has GOT to be stopped.

February 5, 2010 at 11:54 AM
Reply

Wendy

I have one child out of NC schools and three more coming up in them. I had to reteach history to my oldest...and now it seems I will have to teach it in it's entirety for my younger three. Sad and pathetic but what else can we expect from NC schools. It seems that a 'world class' education mean LESS education. And I am sorry...exposing a kid in the 4th and 5th grade is NOT teaching them history. I have a 4th grader. So far this year he has had about 6 hours, at most, of social studies. If it is not on the EOG, it is not taught in elementary school. It is time we got back to the job of teaching our kids and away from these ineffective tests.

February 5, 2010 at 11:15 AM
Reply

Ann

I live in the area where this country started and I AM OUTRAGED! I am always suprised to find people that have no idea what Jamestown and Yorktown are, but I cannot believe the schools would stop teaching history before 1877. Idiots!

February 5, 2010 at 10:17 AM
Reply

ray ban store

I enjoyed the article and thanks because of posting such valuable opinion in lieu of of all of us to amass, I be the start here it both worthwhile and revelatory and I contrive to set up it as again as I can. ray ban 3025

February 5, 2010 at 9:46 AM
Reply

MaryJane

Well, not exactly. For years history has been diminished and "rewritten". I have children who were educated in the Government schools and I found a great need to reteach them at home. (NC) From the beginning, public schools were began so that citizens would be well informed of the founding of this nation as well as what it was founded on in order that they be informed to secure the Republic. They have been taken over by the radicals since Carter made them Federally directed (NEA)

February 5, 2010 at 9:21 AM
Reply

Carole Jacoby

Contact the School Administrators, start at the top and demand they continue teaching History as it is. Personally, we need to begin getting rid of the liberals who run our Schools. Too much waste and too little intelligence in charge of our children.

February 4, 2010 at 11:15 PM
Reply

Vanessa Jeter

To get the whole story about the comprehensive social studies standards being considered in North Carolina, consider reading this for yourself: http://www.ncpublicschools.org/acre/standards/phase2/ You'll see that students will continue to study the Founding Fathers, US history before reconstruction and other foundational information about our nation's past. In fact, North Carolina state law requires that these important items will continue to be taught.

February 3, 2010 at 4:14 PM
Reply

Kelly

Teaching American History is one of the single most import elements of a childs education. If they don't understand how we arrived were we're at they'll never understand the truth about America. This is just another way to rewrite our history without haveing to tell it. Ignorance is not bliss for the people that have to deal with it. Get a clue teach the whole history.

February 3, 2010 at 2:59 PM
Reply

Wade Evans

The reason to teach the abridged version of US history is because the teachers don't know US history before 1877. The formative years are the most important because the character of the US was being formed during the early years of our history.

February 3, 2010 at 2:52 PM
Reply

Jim Tanner

Sounds innocuous doesn't it ?. Just another attempt to do away with our sovereignty and blend us into the World Governments under the guise of environmental considerations. This is how these parasites work.

February 3, 2010 at 2:49 PM
Reply

Janet

Environment is not more important then History. I want my kids to know their History. They learn about global issues in Science. Leave the History alone. Its sad that the public school system has already moved key parts of our History. Private school is looking more and more better by the moment.

February 3, 2010 at 2:41 PM
Reply