Uncategorized

Dan Springer

Seattle, WA

105

comments

Yuppie 9-1-1

November 13, 2009 - 12:02 PM | by: Dan Springer

Emergency responders around the U.S. are concerned about a growing trend, a practice they've dubbed 'yuppie 9-1-1. It's when someone with limited survival skills goes out into the wilderness and then relies on technology as a safety net. Locator beacons that hit global positioning satellites are increasingly being taken into the remote back country. And while the devices have saved lives, there have also been a number of false alarms and calls for help where there really was no emergency at all. Search and rescue leaders say hikers who cry wolf cost taxpayers money and put other lives in real danger.

The typical misuse involves inexperienced hikers who get cold or caught by some bad weather. Instead of waiting out the storm, they hit the 9-1-1 button. But one case in Arizona was an extreme abuse. A father was camping with his son. He hit the S.O.S. on his GPS locator three times in three days. The last time was because he was deyhdrated and drank from a stream. He panicked because the water tasted salty. Search teams did find the pair and after the third 'rescue' they order the two out of the wilderness.

Conversely, the units have been credited with saving lives. Ed Cooley was taking photographs of the Fall colors deep in the Ozarks when he fell 30 feet breaking several bones and getting pinned in shallow water under a tree branch. He used his SPOT satellite GPS messenger to call for help. Hours later he was rescued.

Authorities also say that the technology can help shorten the length of searches by allowing them to pinpoint the missing. But the problem comes in when inexperienced people use the devices as a safety net. There is no substitute for being prepared.

matt

That was an interesting suggestion, if you call for a needless rescue, reimbursement should be required along with safety/survival classes. If you get put in a situation requiring legitimate rescue due to lack of knowledge/foresight then Safety/Survival classes. but in both scenarios the individuals need to relocated to an urban environment so they cannot cause further burden to the rescue personnel. The Rescue system should not be like the revolving door of the justice system.

November 16, 2009 at 12:01 PM
Reply

Capt. Henry E. Marx - Landfall Navigation

I agree that the Spot Technology is "great". However, as one EMS Responder noted, it is already being abused by " non life threatening" panics and tends to over load the system. That said, for terrestial SAR it is probably pretty good. For Martime Use: If I am drifting around in the Gulf of Maine in my Life Jacket - I want to know that the USCG - the professionals - not a private (for profit company) is responding to my distress call. Also, the USCG has the ability to utilize the AMVER Network, Channel 16 to notify any vessel in the area etc., of the distress situation.

November 14, 2009 at 10:14 AM
Reply

Michael

They should be a fine for misuse!

November 14, 2009 at 9:59 AM
Reply

Annie

I disagree that this is not a political issue. First of all, it is municipalities and limited budget resources that are affected by such nonsense. Tell me your city's budget is not a political concern. Secondly, attitudes like these where immature spoiled over-grown children who think only of immediate gratification are responsible for the political climate in which we find ourselves....

November 14, 2009 at 9:57 AM
Reply

Greg

This is not a political issue here folks. Let's not cloud the intent of this article with drabble about which political affiliation would be more prepared for wilderness survival. I'm about as conservative as they come, and I have liberal friends that I would follow into the Amazon jungle with the tumost faith in their ability.

November 14, 2009 at 9:18 AM
Reply

On Duty

Coming from a person that works in Emergency Services and has a wife that works in the 911 center. I have to say that there are more useless calls to Emergency Service 911 centers than there are legitimate calls. I have responded to and listened to calls go out every night for simple things such as "my garbage can is out in the rain and I do not want to go out in the rain" or "I would like an officer to come to my house and talk with my undisciplined children because I can not control them” these useless calls are in fact a strain on our economic well being. I have answered more calls for false house alarms (at the same house and in one day) than anything else. Yes, we should charge these people for their blatant miss use of emergency services. The only way people learn ANYTHING these days is if we hit them where it hurts... IN THE WALLET! Little do people know that these non-emergency lines go to the same emergency service center and tie up phone lines and valuable time that dispatchers could be using to save a life, but no... these yuppies are worried about how late they are going to be for their hair appointment or to pick up their dogs from the sitters... Next time you think that just by calling the "NON-EMERGENCY LINE" you are not doing any harm.... Think again and be a little less selfish! THIS GOES TO ALL PEOPLE REGUARDLESS OF POLITICAL AFFILIATION, PLEASE THINK BEFORE YOU DIAL. I forgot to add one example... people who call for weather updates, road closure, school schedules, trash routes, and other meaningless things... get off your tails and handle it yourself. You are a grown up ACT LIKE ONE!

November 14, 2009 at 7:30 AM
Reply

sk

So hypochondriacs shouldn't go camping? I like the political divide on this, where conservative appears to equal manly, responsible and prepared while liberal appears to equal wuss. This is definately a fair and balanced audience with absolutely no assumptions whatsoever. None at all. As a liberal, I value my independence, acknowledge any position of privelage in my life, and believe that human life has value and therefore believe in taking care of those who are not able to do so themselves. To believe that this is an equal opportunity country is a fallacy of propaganda and consumer advertising. We all view the world through a different lens, no lens is exactly the same, and no political party is made up of people who are unified in thought. I know conservatives who think camping involves room service and liberals who camp with so much preparedness you wonder how they hike under the weight of their bandaids and bottled water, and vice versa. This is more of a stupid human tricks issue, not a political one.

November 14, 2009 at 5:42 AM
Reply

Veritas Maximus

The same liberals who hit the panic button for no good reason are the ones who rant about how "you don't need a gun" but then start yelling "ohmygod shoot the bear shoot the bear!" when a griz rears up to figure out what's going on. The griz promptly woofs and scoots, and I didn't even have to take the rifle off my shoulder. But the urbanite liberal yuppie puppies are still shivering in terror.

November 14, 2009 at 4:57 AM
Reply

bree

They should publish the idiot's name so all his friends know what an idiot he is. Also, after the first false alarm they should warn the "yuppies' they won't respond to any more calls from them.

November 14, 2009 at 4:23 AM
Reply

Huh

If someone hits the emergency button, why would they allow them to stay in the wilderness? They should be required to go home and not return for at least a few weeks. Maybe require that once you hit the button you cannot return to the wild until AFTER you pay for, take, and pass a survival class. (similar to making drunks take AA classes.) And bill everyone who calls for SAR. The amount of the bill should be commensurate with the cost, ability to pay, and inversely commensurate with the degree of emergency. (ie: The more costly the more you pay, the more money you make the more you pay so you 'feel the pain', and the larger the emergency the less you pay.)

November 14, 2009 at 4:01 AM
Reply

Huh

If someone hits the emergency button, why would they allow them to stay in the wilderness? They should be required to go home and not return for at least a few weeks. Maybe require that once you hit the button you cannot return to the wild until AFTER you pay for, take, and pass a survival class. (similar to making drunks take AA classes.) And bill everyone who calls for SAR. The amount of the bill should be commensurate with the cost, ability to pay, and inversely commensurate with the degree of emergency. (ie: The more costly the more you pay, the more money you make the more you pay so you 'feel the pain', and the larger the emergency the less you pay.)

November 14, 2009 at 4:01 AM
Reply

Mountain Mike

Having lived near wilderness areas in Eastern California for many years, I must say that there absolutely must be a charge for these rescue services. Our local SAR is overwhelmed every summer with amateurs who have no idea of the financial strain they cause on our county budgets.

November 14, 2009 at 2:44 AM
Reply

Charlie

Having been a volunteer rescue person, living in a National Forest, and responding to various emergency calls, my perspective is difficult to portray with a broad brush. All calls are different. It would present a great problem to "judge" the degree of emergency or need. The stand-by cost of these services is high. Reimbursement would often be beyond the average person's means. Education is the only "help" I can think of that might work.

November 14, 2009 at 1:47 AM
Reply

Jon

Just a general comment regarding needless 9-1-1 calls. SOME of the needless calls are difficult to avoid. I have two advanced degrees from universities. I am very skilled at doing research in books and online. HOWEVER, some emergency agencies (and some phone books) almost go out of their way to "hide" the non-emergency phone numbers for some emergency agencies. If I have trouble finding the non-emergency numbers --imagine the challenges faced by persons with limited education or who are elderly. We need to make the NON-EMERGENCY numbers much easier to locate. That MIGHT cut down on some of the needless 9-1-1 calls. However, there will always be a large bunch of foolish people who will STILL call 9-1-1 for the dumbest reasons.

November 13, 2009 at 10:51 PM
Reply

Stan Ray

The whole point to the SPOT device is to utilize present day technology to aid in search and rescue. A few years ago having a radio in the wilderness that could actually broadcast 5 miles was unheard of for the average individual. Technology and people on the ground willing to devote part of their lives to aid and assist those in distress are paramount here. In 20/20 hindsight you can always judge whether a call was required or not, but you can never decide that before arriving on the scene. I have had contact with those people, not utilizing them but discussing situations with them and have found them to be professional in every aspect. I have the utmost respect and confidence in their abilities. Most are oncall and non-paid volunteers. Officials are loathe to charge users of their service for fear that they may decide not to call for help because of the fee. How much is your life worth? If you are willing to spend several thousand dollars on equipment, travel, and supplies to put yourself in the wilderness thinking you are prepared when you are not, how much should you pay for your education.

November 13, 2009 at 10:16 PM
Reply

Bunny

I'm a "tree hugger" who's capable of surviving quite well in the wilderness. I was raised to hunt and fish, and to pick wild mushrooms, sorel, okra, and other vegetables to feed myself. Most of my family and many of my friends are the same way, and we're all liberal. Many of us are in public service, too - policemen, firemen, etc. - and we all despise the idiots who abuse the 9-1-1 system. Please don't make assumptions about others' abilities based solely on their social and/or political leanings.

November 13, 2009 at 9:51 PM
Reply

mike

I would just say that if they abuse it, then make them pay for it....These things should have some kind of serial numbers that the SR can see when the button is pushed....If they abuse, next time do not go after them...What happens when the SR is out on a bogus call and someone who really meeds help is waiting? Make them pay for it as well...When you call 911 and they come and get you in an ambulance, you pay for that...it should be no different with this...There is always some who try to mess up a good thing...

November 13, 2009 at 9:11 PM
Reply

Perry williams

Why should the charge for the service rendered only be paid if the call was unwarranted or due to inexperience. If 911 is called, the person calling should pay. If I was in a bad enough situation that I needed to use an emergency gps locator, I would gladly pay for the service. There should be no judgement call, a service is rendered, it should be paid for.

November 13, 2009 at 8:29 PM
Reply

LisaOP

Liberal, Foxnews crowd...that is irrelavant. Some jerk from some urban area goes into the wilderness without proper planning and SAR ends up getting called. If it's not a true emergency, bill them. They don't pay lien their house and garnish their wages. EMS services (paid or volunteer)should not be misused and those that do so should pay. Better yet - publish their names in the newspaper for all to read.

November 13, 2009 at 8:23 PM
Reply

wethrowpie

Dave B: Because a conservative wouldn't call for help unless he/she were really hurt.

November 13, 2009 at 7:34 PM
Reply