Crime

Claudia Cowan

San Francisco, CA

227

comments

Helmet Cams for Cops

November 3, 2009 - 1:14 PM | by: Claudia Cowan

Police say dash-cams, taser cams and home videos, which make such good fodder for television news, only tell part of the story.

Starting in a few weeks, officers in San Jose, Calif., will become the first in the nation to field-test the Axon-- a miniature digital camera integrated into their uniforms --  to record events as they happen. Rank and file officers told us they're curious to see how the cameras work, but welcome a new hi-tech tool to help compile critical evidence, and protect them from false allegations of misconduct.

Right now, there are several such investigations underway in San Jose, including allegations of excessive force against a student arrested for assault. A rooommate’s cell phone video of the incident has caused controversy about the officer’s behavior, but union leaders say that video doesn't tell the whole story. Many officers told us they like the idea of having a complete, tamper-proof, video record that's admissible in court, so a jury can see first-hand what the officer said, saw, and did.

And if a cop uses excessive force, department heads will see that, too. The department is developing it's camera policy, but it's believed officers would be required to record any interactions that could be questioned later. The bottom line is this -- at a time when they seem to be videotaped by everyone else, police say it's about time they got their own cameras rolling, to shine some light on the truth.

Joey

you are a figgit

November 5, 2009 at 6:08 PM
Reply

Tim McDonald

No argument with obeying the law, Leon. But I fear you and Adam have missed Matthew's important point here. The best predictor of future behavior is to examine past performance. Red light camera video is the most prolific existing example of how law enforcement will likely employ helmetcam video in the courtroom in the future. Local officials deliberately shorten yellow lights to make it impossible NOT to run the red light, thereby guaranteeing police will have video of you "breaking the law" -- at nearly $500 per citation, here in CA. The short yellows are actually known to CAUSE more accidents than the red light cameras PREVENT: local government is deliberately hurting -- even killing -- it's local citizens for the price of a traffic ticket! Don't believe me? Check out highwayrobbery.net -- what you find there should should make your blood boil. All of this made possible by the technology of video -- plus a blatant disregard for this little document we call "the Constitution." We must be all dead-set against providing taxpayer-funded technologies to law enforcement as long as they abuse the public trust in this manner. We can still have a free country, if we're willing to remain diligent.

November 4, 2009 at 6:11 PM
Reply

william

The camera's are a great idea. Idea being the key word here. However if we really want to protect ourselves from these cops stop talking when they question you. Stick to asking for a lawyer!! I see so much of this.. they threaten and try to force you to talk or play the good guy role "if you talk i can help you" yup right in to the squad and then to lock up. People shut your mouths we have rights use them. The cops are stupid in on aspect for sure. We are just as dumb for not invoking our rights.

November 4, 2009 at 2:50 PM
Reply

Pat

Chuck just keep sucking on your bong dude, go back into your medical marijuana induced paranoid state that you were in while writing your post, Let the grown ups talk.

November 4, 2009 at 2:26 PM
Reply

InsidetheStorm

The only reason "Police Misconduct" will go down is because there wont be anymore police officers under investigation for false complaints by scumbags trying to get leniency for their crimes by complaining that the mean officer hurt their feelings... =[

November 4, 2009 at 2:21 PM
Reply

Sandy Sandfort

Finally! I wrote about this *15* year ago in Wired Magazine. http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.12/sandfort.if.html Of course, my recommended safeguards against tampering and destruction will almost certainly not be implemented. We will have plenty of cases such as the murder of that Brazilian man by London cops in the London underground (subway). There were numerous surveillance cameras that should have witnessed the scene, yet all of the critically placed ones were "not working" or had "no tape" or whatever. Uh-huh. (Sorry if this goes out twice, but the website did something "funny.")

November 4, 2009 at 2:03 PM
Reply

Sandy Sandfort

Finally! I wrote about this *15* year ago in Wired Magazine. http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.12/sandfort.if.html Of course, my recommended safeguards against tampering and destruction will almost certainly not be implemented. We will have plenty of cases such as the murder of that Brazilian man by London cops in the London underground (subway). There were numerous surveillance cameras that should have witnessed the scene, yet all of the critically placed ones were "not working" or had "no tape" or whatever. Uh-huh.

November 4, 2009 at 2:01 PM
Reply

Sam C

Chuck, that is such a GREAT idea! The only bad thing is that those cameras won't be able to see much through all the slime, dirt and grease that comes with those "public servants". As far as the Cop Cams go, yes, it's time we fight back. I've been in the industry 14 years and all the false allegations of misconduct have taught me one thing; I should have been a fireman.

November 4, 2009 at 12:57 PM
Reply

Chuck Roast

Speaking of cameras, I think all public servants should have a camera trained ON THEM at all times they are on the payroll. All State Legislators, Federal employees, etc. should have them installed in their offices, autos, and the feed should stream live on the Internet so the public can view any of them at any time, and it would protect them against claims of violations of law should those claims ever come up. We the People are on camera all day long, 24-7 and the feed is controlled by the governmental agencies. If the purpose is "public safety", then let's protect government employees from potential bribes, coverup conspiracies, etc. by having a camera directed at them daily, during all hours they are working. Closed hearings on National Security matters should be the only exemption. There may be a few more, but I can't think of them at present. I bet some public servants wouldn't like being on camera all during their drive to work, at work, and on the way home, etc. But it is for their own safety.

November 4, 2009 at 12:18 PM
Reply

Ron

32 yr leo here. This will benefit the San Jose PD more than the citizens. I've been accused of things that people "thought" happened because they were drunk or high. FYI, the state is broke, but not the City of San Jose.

November 4, 2009 at 11:42 AM
Reply

Bart J

Why film potentially abusive cops who don't know the law? Instead, hire better educated cops without abuse/authority issues and pay them more?

November 4, 2009 at 11:39 AM
Reply

Bart J

Cops are not paid enough and should be better educated. But one of their tools is being able to lie to the detainees/arrestees, and intimidate. In critical cases we'll hear 'video not available / camera inoperable, or not turned on'. They already threaten to arrest those trying to video - interesting the cops agreed to this.

November 4, 2009 at 11:35 AM
Reply

steve

I'm a former Deputy Sheriff and the video cannot be tampered with unless you like tampering with evidence and want to go to jail! The videos have tell the story the people edit out of their videos. Rodney King is just one example. Cameras on patrol are a good thing. Especially since it is a different point of view than the dude with a cell phone or a video camera standing on the street corner where he isn't picking up audio and is seeing the event from a different vantage point. We use multiple angles/views in reviewing plays in football why not use multiple angles/views in reviewing police conduct?

November 4, 2009 at 10:49 AM
Reply

CoreyC

actually, this is good news ... because i thought california was going bankrupt.....hurting for money....and had no funds for trivial BS like this......ALSO i happen to agree with Tim Alcoser and his view of the policia.

November 4, 2009 at 10:10 AM
Reply

jeff

These cameras will not tell the whole story as the article says. The point of view will be from the officer forward. This will leave out what the officer's hands are doing and knee's are doing. Such as a hand on the throat or a knee in the neck. As for the comment that the video will be tamper proof.... give me a break!!!

November 4, 2009 at 9:32 AM
Reply

Dave

OK, let the police use the cameras for the sake of protecting the people. However, I don't think these cameras should be used for television shows and network ratings.

November 4, 2009 at 8:28 AM
Reply

Bruce David Schultes

Way to fight the war and not the fear! Take it to the gates! Turn the tables back.

November 4, 2009 at 7:31 AM
Reply

T Simpson

NOW LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT CAMEAS FOR COPS AND THE STATE IS BROKE AND NEEDS A BAIL OUT?

November 4, 2009 at 7:19 AM
Reply

John

I work in corrections. Everything is recorded. There is Zero privacy. The cameras have protected me in every case of false accusation. There have been many. Good for these cops. A camera to finnaly show there point of view.

November 4, 2009 at 3:26 AM
Reply

joe

where does this end? 1984, Gattaca?.. there are too many movies already that are coming true.. some day we'll wake up and know there is nothing to hide.. and be every angry about it too..privacy will be part of history..

November 4, 2009 at 3:08 AM
Reply