Asia

23

comments

McChrystal to FOX: “Debate Healthy”

October 2, 2009 - 12:13 PM | by: Greg Palkot

"The process of going through a very detailed policy level debate is incredibly important and incredibly healthy."

That was the diplomatic answer from General Stanley McChrystal to my question about what happened in the meeting with President Obama and his National Security Team this week regarding Afghanistan (McChrystal participated via videophone).

McChrystal was appearing at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London.

He repeated his tough talk about the war from his leaked assesment, that the situation is "serious," "deteriorating," that "violence is up," and the "insurgency is stronger."

He did say that the West could "win" but that we "must redefine the fight."   That is, beef-up the counter-insurgency attack plus more troops.  He said the fight was "under-resourced."

The hitch is, not all in Washngton feel this way.  Vice President Biden is leading the charge for an approach labled counter-"terrorism," less emphasis on more troops, more on drone attacks on Al Qaeda along the Afghan-Pakistan border.

The President appears to be in the middle on this one and has promised more meetings before a decision is made.

Tellingly when he talks about the Afghanistan war these days he does not speak of defeating the tough Taliban insurgency, just (!) al Qaeda.

It's a debate that no doubt was extended Friday when the President met with the General on board Air Force One during Obama's quick stop in Copenhagen to try and push Chciago's Olympics bid.

The President probably hoping his luck in Afghanistan will be better than in Denmark!

Roger Barnes

Did a 5-year-old write this? Do you guys pay editors to correct spelling and grammar mistakes?! That's the most poorly-written article I've ever seen from a major news outlet, and I'm not exaggerating.

October 3, 2009 at 12:59 PM
Reply

Remember

"A good plan violently executed NOW is better than a perfect plan executed too late." -Gen. Patton, WWII

October 3, 2009 at 12:12 PM
Reply

JackBe

Nationl security my butt. I say pull the troops and let them all kill themselves. This country will never become a democratic country as some of these Republican war mongers are stating. This country needs to wake up and start putting money back into thic country instead of flushing it down the toilet on foreign wars.

October 3, 2009 at 12:06 PM
Reply

Multilanguage news! » LIVESHOTS: McChrystal Tells Fox ‘Debate Healthy’- Obama, McChrystal Meet

[...] foxnewsonline@foxnews.com post something interesting on site today. [...]

October 3, 2009 at 11:45 AM
Reply

barnett

lets get back to the basics,kill them all and let god sort them out. a veteran paratrooper!!!

October 3, 2009 at 11:05 AM
Reply

John

Just what did America win in Irag? where is the leader of the 9/11 attack? The Ignorant allowed a net wit to lie to us the UN and the rest of the world.

October 3, 2009 at 8:11 AM
Reply

kappi

Blaming Bush is showing where you come from. NATO is handling this war. Now we have a new commander in the White House. He is not doing any better the fact is he can't make a decision. The general in charge today made a clear demand for more troops.

October 3, 2009 at 7:01 AM
Reply

grizzdogg

IF Mc Chrystal needs something to finish the job then Obama should give it to him. It is just that simple

October 3, 2009 at 5:04 AM
Reply

Kenneth n. Blakkan

What do you expect. He is nothing more then a dictator from Chicago with his band of thugs.

October 3, 2009 at 12:38 AM
Reply

opopoli0

LOL @ you wingnuts blamimg Obama. I'm not even an Obama fan, but dang! You all need to just jump off a cliff or something, or at least, don't reproduce.

October 2, 2009 at 10:02 PM
Reply

usafo4ret

Nero fiddled while Rome burned. Let's hope our President doesn't keep fiddling around until the entire Middle East and then the USA burn!

October 2, 2009 at 9:53 PM
Reply

All news in one place! » LIVESHOTS: McChrystal Tells Fox ‘Debate Healthy’- Obama, McChrystal Meet

[...] foxnewsonline@foxnews.com post something interesting on site today. [...]

October 2, 2009 at 8:18 PM
Reply

Lanny

It's evident that Obama's interests are not in supporting our Military. It is more important to him that he land the Olympics (which he failed to do) and sell his health care. He continues not to lead this Country but to rather mis-lead the Country. I believe he represents a serious security threat to our people and our way of life. This man is not the change I wanted nor expected.

October 2, 2009 at 7:18 PM
Reply

Richard

Obama is acting like a community organizer.

October 2, 2009 at 6:15 PM
Reply

Pete in Dallas

We should have defoliated the place which would remove their ability to provide the world with illegal drugs. With the drugs being cut off, no money, no money no arms, no ammo, no food. The winters there would finish them off sealing them into their caves. When we start operating to win instead of not to lose we will achieve our mission-to vanquish them from the face of this earth!

October 2, 2009 at 5:27 PM
Reply

Eugene J. Callahan

President Obama spends more time with the IOC than he does with his Afghanistan commander, General McChrystal (25 minutes on Air Force One) Where are his priorities ??

October 2, 2009 at 4:31 PM
Reply

Mark Lubenow

I always think it is a good idea to proof read articles before posting. What's the deal with all the typos?

October 2, 2009 at 3:57 PM
Reply

DA BEAR

There you go again blaming "W" for our troops in Afganistan.If I'm not mistaken the bad guys from 9/11 were training there.Now "H" needs to man up and give the troops all the tools to track down these fanatics and kill them before they kill us.People need to stop and look at the big picture. God Bless our Troops...

October 2, 2009 at 3:07 PM
Reply

YouKnowMe

Why do Republicans/conservatives say things like leave our troops out to die. First of all they are not sent to war to die they are sent to war to defeat the enemy. If they should die that is a consequence of going to war. President Obama did not send them to suffer the consequence of going to war (die) President Bush did. President Obama is trying unlike President Bush to bring an end to the consequences of going to war (dying) by fighting the right fight which we should have done when we started, instead of sending all of the troops to Iraq and not paying attention to the right fight. So you blame President Bush for the troops dieing in Afganistan.

October 2, 2009 at 1:31 PM
Reply

brian

splechek+grmmer+edjumcation=CREDIBILITY.

October 2, 2009 at 1:22 PM
Reply